Archive for December, 2011

I Don’t Understand What Anyone Is Saying Anymore

Thursday, December 15th, 2011

A great piece written by social entrepreneur Dan Pallotta examining management speak. This appeared in the Harvard Business Review on Dec. 5, 2011.

I’d say that in about half of my business conversations, I have almost no idea what other people are saying to me. The language of internet business models has made the problem even worse. When I was younger, if I didn’t understand what people were saying, I thought I was stupid. Now I realize that if it’s to people’s benefit that I understand them but I don’t, then they’re the ones who are stupid.

There are at least five strains of this epidemic.

Abstractionitis

We have forgotten how to use the real names of real things. Like doorknobs. Instead, people talk about the idea of doorknobs, without actually using the word “doorknob.” So a new idea for a doorknob becomes “an innovation in residential access.” Expose yourself repeatedly to the extrapolation of this practice to things more complicated than a doorknob and you really just need to carry Excedrin around with you all day.

Acronymitis

This is a disease of epic proportions in the world of charity. I was at a meeting just two days ago at which several well-meaning staff members of a charity were presenting to their board, and the meat of their discussion revolved around the acronyms SCEA and some other one that began with “R” that I can’t recall. In the span of three minutes these acronyms must have been used eight times each. They were central to any understanding of the topic at hand, but they were never defined. So I had not the vaguest idea what the presenters were talking about. None. Could have been talking about how to make a beurre-blanc sauce for all I know.

Valley Girl 2.0

My partner and I were at a restaurant in the San Fernando Valley five years ago, and a real-live Valley girl was sitting in the booth behind us talking on her cell phone. We couldn’t stop listening to her. She had a world-class ability to string together half-sentences devoid of any substance whatsoever. And yet you felt as if something important were being discussed! “And she was like, ummm, and I was just like, you know, umm, no way, really, like, yeah, and when she was like that, I was just like..umm….” She could go on in this way for extended periods of time without mentioning any actual people, actions, or thoughts. There’s a business version of this illness. It involves the use of words such as “space,” “around,” “synergy,” and “value-add” with a healthy dose of equivocators like “sort of” and “kind of” to ensure that there is no commitment to anything being said: “I’m in the sort of sustainability space around kind of bringing synergistic value-add to other people’s work around this kind of space.” Oh, OK, that explains it.

Meaningless Expressions

I wrote about the phrase “thinking outside the box” recently and how overused and utterly misunderstood the expression is. There are many more. Another term that has lost its meaning is “Let’s exceed the customer’s expectations.” Employees who hear it just leave the pep rally, inhabit some kind of temporary dazed intensity, and then go back to doing things exactly the way they did before the speech. Customers almost universally never experience their expectations being met, much less exceeded. How can you exceed the customer’s expectations if you have no idea what those expectations are? I was at a Hilton a few weeks ago. They had taken this absurdity to its logical end. There was a huge sign in the lobby that said, “Our goal is to exceed the customer’s expectation.” The best way to start would be to take down that bullshit sign that just reminds me, as a customer, how cosmic the gap is between what businesses say and what they do. My expectation is not to have signs around that tell me you want to exceed my expectations.

Abstract Valley Girl 2.0 Acronymitis Using Meaningless Expressions

This is when you combine the four diseases above. So you get phrases like, “You should meet this guy with the SIO. He’s sort of this kind of social entrepreneur thinking outside of the box in the sustainability space and working on these ideas around sort of web-based social media, and he’s in a round two capital raise in the VP space with the people at SVNP.” How many times have you heard what you now recall to be precisely this sentence?

This would all be funny if it weren’t true. People just don’t make sense anymore. You’ll save yourself a lot of trouble if you internalize this. Observe it, deconstruct it, and appreciate just how ridiculous most business conversation has become.

You will gain tremendous credibility, become much more productive, make those around you much more productive, and experience a great deal more joy in your working life if you look someone in the eye after hearing one of these verbal brain jammers and tell the person, “I don’t have any idea what you just said to me.”

Dan Pallotta is an expert in nonprofit sector innovation and a pioneering social entrepreneur. He is the founder of Pallotta TeamWorks, which invented the multiday AIDSRides and Breast Cancer 3-Days. He is the president of Advertising for Humanity and the author of Uncharitable: How Restraints on Nonprofits Undermine Their Potential.

Two Shining Examples of Bipartisan Leaders

Wednesday, December 7th, 2011

Mike Murphy
Peritus
Senior Vice President

Senior Vice President Mike Murphy’s featured op-ed in The Indy Star, Two Shining Examples of Bipartisan Leaders.

We hear a lot about the lack of bipartisan statesmanship in government at all levels. Examples abound: Failure of the supercommittee; a looming Armageddon over right to work proposals; lame-duck politicians rushing through their agenda before the “enemy” takes over. There is one common denominator among all of these examples. In each instance, someone has failed to pose the question, “What can we accomplish together?” Or, more important, to listen for an answer.

Unfortunately, just when Indiana most needs bipartisan leadership at all levels, Hoosiers have learned that they will lose two of our most effective leaders to retirement next year — state Reps. Ralph Foley and Dale Grubb. One is a Republican; the other, a Democrat. One is a small-town lawyer from Martinsville; the other, a farmer from Covington. With 46 years of combined experience, you might expect Foley and Grubb to be household names in Indiana, but you’ve probably never heard their names. Why? Because each man would rather be effective than flashy. They would rather be inclusive than divisive. Neither man has a stentorian voice. But when they speak, ever so quietly, everyone listens. That is because they put themselves last and the common good first.

I was Ralph Foley’s seatmate my freshman year in the Indiana House. The first advice he gave me was to “get up and shake the hand of someone across the aisle.” Fortunately, one of the first persons I met was Dale Grubb.

Post 9/11, Grubb and I asked the question “What can we accomplish together?” We teamed up to co-author 10 bills and a constitutional amendment that worked their way into law and the state Constitution. The result? Our state is safer and better prepared in case of a terrorist attack in Indiana.

Foley has had the opportunity to be very partisan. As sometimes chairman, and other times ranking minority member of the powerful Rules Committee, he carried his party’s water, to be sure. But I don’t know anyone who has ever been mad at him. Foley’s arguments always have been founded upon calm logic, never pettiness. He has always sought common ground, not partisan advantage.

As I asked myself recently, “What am I thankful for?” I thought of people like Foley and Grubb. And I dared ponder another question. What would have happened if Foley and Grubb had chaired the supercommittee? Maybe our nation would be saved.